Heh
I seriously doubt if section 1 is supposed to be "wtf!!! wtf is ur problem kkk!!!" :-)
Just to remind all who consider wikipedia an authorative source of info :-P
*Update* Damn, it got fixed ! :-)
Just random stuff that I think off - could be work , hobby , state of mind , etc , etc , etc
Two deep breaths, some cold water and nice game of CS is what the doctor prescribes.
I think we should mobilize crack teams in every city. Who at night somewhere around 8:30pm will project objectional material onto public buildings & monuments. Something like the laser shows at Pink Floyd concerts. Also footage from sting operations on corrupt officials that expose their true colours can be displayed for the viewing pleasure of all.
Media bombs can be planted at street corners, so when a pedestrian passes by he'd be assaulted by 'filth' that the govt. is trying hard to put down.
Of course this would amount to a lot of sound POLLUTION or audio terrorism (to use a buzz word) and the people & govt. will opt to have crap were it belongs - in the idiot box.
Dude I agree with you, but why so much bile?
@ anon
ya ya bugger :-)
@ moonjungle
heh, I am not 'for crap' - more for the fact that I would like to decide what is good for me and what is not, not some braindead power hungry greedy politician.
@ unawoken
well, it was totally pissing me off - sucessive governments thinking they can decide what the general public should/shouldnot see totally sucks : that too when they are not really doing a objective job of it.
"unless something is done with the intent of inciting public unrest"
Slippery slope. Who defines public unrest?
choodagelle maashe!
namakku rashtrapathikku oru letter ezhuthaam.. banglorile paavam software engineer maarude oru hargi..namukku parayaam "who dares wins" polathe progarms aanu namme inspire cheyyunnathu ennokke.. "Rashtrapathikku Oru Suparsha"
@ aaditya
true, that is slippery slope : but there are cases where national security or harmony in society is at grave risk.
@ ak
heh, now i am cool :-P
and no to your 'letter' - those have accomplished nothing so far.
@ Aaditya & Mridul
I think a slippery pole is in order for Ghandhiji. Not a slope.
Eda, from now on I'll leave a comment everytime I read a 'new' post on your blog. Just so you know I can read.
I know you read - just that you miss some of them :-P
When all of us agree we could have done _much_ better, I am pleased that at least we are moving into positive direction, though slowly. Imagine the progress we could have made sans corruption/religious issues/bad politics/terrorism ...
Very true - I would love it if the progress was faster : what atleast it is going at a nontrivial rate forward !
All magazines come up with this kind of editions in the end of every year. We should have monthly review of the progress.
25 years is good enough period to review and evaluate the change in the society (remember 5 year plans ?).
Some mags and newspapers do this sort of review ... but it rarely is as exhaustive as this edition - ofcourse, there might be fields the issue has missed.
But I particularly liked about the edition was not only what was done, but who where doing it and how it was presented.
4 Comments:
And that's why WP is a reasonably authoritative source of information (on non specialist subjects atleast). :)
this one was way way too obvious !
it was just a matter of hours before it was to get fixed (it did last around for much much longer though).
But there are so many inconsistencies in most of what you read that frankly I dont use it anymore.
hey this ain't the smae infamous kk from crec is it :P
Neither do I really but it's okay for simple things like technical topics and other non-controversial subjects.
Post a Comment
<< Home